Blog

  • Texas designates Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist group

    Texas designates Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist group

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Tuesday issued a proclamation designating both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as “foreign terrorist organizations” and “transnational criminal organizations” under Texas law.

    The executive action invokes authority under the Texas Penal Code and Texas Property Code, subjecting both organizations to heightened criminal penalties and prohibiting them from purchasing or acquiring land in Texas. The designation also authorizes civil suits under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code..

    Under Texas Penal Code § 71.01(e), a foreign terrorist organization is defined as “three or more persons operating as an organization at least partially outside the United States who engage in criminal activity and threaten the security of this state or its residents.” Tuesday’s proclamation cites multiple instances of CAIR members’ criminal convictions for terrorism financing and material support, including the 2009 federal case United States v. Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev., where CAIR was identified as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in one of the largest terrorism financing prosecutions in US history.

    Tuesday’s designation triggers several legal consequences. Texas Property Code § 5.253 prohibits designated entities from purchasing land in Texas, with violations subject to mandatory divestiture under Code § 5.257, and both criminal and civil penalties under Code § 5.258 and § 5.259.

    Further, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 125.064(b) authorizes suits against individuals who “habitually associate with others to engage in gang activity as a member of” a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

    The proclamation references several adjacent Texas laws that Governor Abbott has signed into effect this year. House Bill 4211 bans residential property developments from creating Muslim-only compounds, and Senate Bill 17 prohibits foreign adversaries and terrorist organizations from purchasing land.

    Tuesday’s action comes amidst ongoing debate over state versus federal authority in designating terrorist organizations. Federal law reserves terrorism designations to the Secretary of State under the Immigration and Nationality Act, raising potential preemption questions about whether state-level designations conflict with federal foreign policy authority. This follows recent federal executive action related to enforcement and designation of alleged terrorist activity. In September, President Donald Trump designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization and directed a task force to investigate and prosecute domestic terrorist groups.

  • Georgia five minutes from hell

    Georgia five minutes from hell

    Key points

    • Georgia’s democratic backslide alarms EU
    • Georgia’s shift away from democratic norms has raised concerns in the EU, which now considers the country a candidate for membership ‘in name only.’ The EU ambassador in Tbilisi stated that Georgia is no longer on the path to joining the bloc.
      • Ruling party accused of authoritarianism
    • The ruling Georgian Dream party is accused of building an authoritarian regime by jailing opposition leaders and planning to ban main opposition groups. Former officials and diplomats express concern over the loss of political consensus on Georgia’s Western alignment.
      • Economic ties shift towards Russia, China
    • Georgia’s economic orientation is shifting towards Russia and China, with increased oil imports from Russia and a stalled Western-led port project now contracted to a Chinese company. This shift is seen as a missed opportunity for the West to strengthen ties with Georgia.

    Just over a year ago, a diverse array of opposition coalitions jockeyed for votes in Georgia’s parliament, with four of them winning seats. Today, of their eight main leaders, all but one are in jail, in exile or facing criminal charges. The ruling party aims to ban the three main opposition groups outright.

    The slide into one-party rule has shocked many in the tiny South Caucasus country of 3.7 million. In the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Georgia appeared a burgeoning democracy, on the fast track to joining the EU and escaping Russia’s orbit.

    But now it is further from the West than at almost any time in its post-Soviet history, according to an assessment from Brussels, which described its democratic institutions as hobbled and its courts under the thumb of the state.

    This month, the EU declared in a report that Georgia was now a candidate for membership “in name only”. The EU ambassador in Tbilisi said Georgia was no longer on the trajectory to join the bloc at all.

    Senior veterans of Georgian politics and diplomacy who spoke to Reuters about the events of the past few months said it appears as though Georgia is close to a line, beyond which it will be hard for democracy to recover.

    “We are now five minutes away from one-party dictatorship,” said Sergi Kapanadze, a former deputy foreign minister and deputy parliamentary speaker until 2020.

    ‘DEMOCRATISATION MEANS AT SOME POINT YOU WILL LOSE POWER’

    Natalie Sabanadze, Tbilisi’s ambassador to the EU until 2021, said that across decades of often caustic domestic political dispute, there had always been a political consensus that Georgia belongs in the West. That had now been lost.

    “They know that democratisation, which the EU demands, means accepting that at some point you will lose power,” she said of the ruling Georgian Dream party. “They don’t want that. And they are basically building a fully-fledged authoritarian regime.”

    Georgian Dream says it is protecting the country from opposition figures who are trying to seize power and foment a catastrophic war with Russia.

    It is a fear that became palpable after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which evoked memories among Georgians of Russian tanks rolling into the suburbs of Tbilisi in a humiliating defeat by Moscow in a brief war in 2008.

    “Georgia is an island of peace in a very difficult geopolitical region,” said Nino Tsilosani, a ruling party lawmaker serving as deputy speaker in parliament. “What investors and what businesses need is stability.”

    She accused jailed opposition politicians of trying to plot a coup, charges the opposition parties reject as fabricated to justify a crackdown.

    Opponents paint Georgian Dream’s billionaire founder Bidzina Ivanishvili as the author of the authoritarian shift. Some accuse him of being in league with Russia, where he amassed his fortune in the 1990s.

    Gia Khukhashvili, who helped launch the party as Ivanishvili’s top political advisor before breaking with him in 2013, said it was wrong to view his former boss as subservient to Moscow. Rather, Ivanishvili just sees a “coincidence of interests” between the countries, he said.

    “He understands that in this ocean of sharks, he needs an older brother. Who is the older brother? It can only be Russia,” Khukhashvili said.

    ECONOMY TURNS TOWARDS RUSSIA, CHINA

    Located strategically on the Black Sea in a region criss-crossed by oil and gas pipelines, Georgia could, in theory, play a major role in the West’s gambit to diversify energy and trade routes away from Russia.

    After emerging from ethnic conflict and economic collapse that accompanied the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, Georgia experienced rapid growth spurred by investor-friendly policies that accompanied its political turn towards the West.

    That openness has now reversed swiftly, with foreign direct investment falling over the past two years to levels last seen in the early 2000s.

    Just over a year ago, a diverse array of opposition coalitions jockeyed for votes in Georgia’s parliament, with four of them winning seats. Today, of their eight main leaders, all but one are in jail, in exile or facing criminal charges. The ruling party aims to ban the three main opposition groups outright.

    The slide into one-party rule has shocked many in the tiny South Caucasus country of 3.7 million. In the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Georgia appeared a burgeoning democracy, on the fast track to joining the EU and escaping Russia’s orbit.

    But now it is further from the West than at almost any time in its post-Soviet history, according to an assessment from Brussels, which described its democratic institutions as hobbled and its courts under the thumb of the state.

    This month, the EU declared in a report that Georgia was now a candidate for membership “in name only”. The EU ambassador in Tbilisi said Georgia was no longer on the trajectory to join the bloc at all.

    Senior veterans of Georgian politics and diplomacy who spoke to Reuters about the events of the past few months said it appears as though Georgia is close to a line, beyond which it will be hard for democracy to recover.

    “We are now five minutes away from one-party dictatorship,” said Sergi Kapanadze, a former deputy foreign minister and deputy parliamentary speaker until 2020.

    ‘DEMOCRATISATION MEANS AT SOME POINT YOU WILL LOSE POWER’

    Natalie Sabanadze, Tbilisi’s ambassador to the EU until 2021, said that across decades of often caustic domestic political dispute, there had always been a political consensus that Georgia belongs in the West. That had now been lost.

    “They know that democratisation, which the EU demands, means accepting that at some point you will lose power,” she said of the ruling Georgian Dream party. “They don’t want that. And they are basically building a fully-fledged authoritarian regime.”

    Georgian Dream says it is protecting the country from opposition figures who are trying to seize power and foment a catastrophic war with Russia.

    It is a fear that became palpable after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which evoked memories among Georgians of Russian tanks rolling into the suburbs of Tbilisi in a humiliating defeat by Moscow in a brief war in 2008.

    “Georgia is an island of peace in a very difficult geopolitical region,” said Nino Tsilosani, a ruling party lawmaker serving as deputy speaker in parliament. “What investors and what businesses need is stability.”

    She accused jailed opposition politicians of trying to plot a coup, charges the opposition parties reject as fabricated to justify a crackdown.

    Opponents paint Georgian Dream’s billionaire founder Bidzina Ivanishvili as the author of the authoritarian shift. Some accuse him of being in league with Russia, where he amassed his fortune in the 1990s.

    Gia Khukhashvili, who helped launch the party as Ivanishvili’s top political advisor before breaking with him in 2013, said it was wrong to view his former boss as subservient to Moscow. Rather, Ivanishvili just sees a “coincidence of interests” between the countries, he said.

    “He understands that in this ocean of sharks, he needs an older brother. Who is the older brother? It can only be Russia,” Khukhashvili said.

    ECONOMY TURNS TOWARDS RUSSIA, CHINA

    Located strategically on the Black Sea in a region criss-crossed by oil and gas pipelines, Georgia could, in theory, play a major role in the West’s gambit to diversify energy and trade routes away from Russia.

    After emerging from ethnic conflict and economic collapse that accompanied the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, Georgia experienced rapid growth spurred by investor-friendly policies that accompanied its political turn towards the West.

    That openness has now reversed swiftly, with foreign direct investment falling over the past two years to levels last seen in the early 2000s.

    Growth has held up, with a flood of Russian businesses and IT workers into Georgia since the start of war in Ukraine proving a boon to the economy. The World Bank forecasts Georgia’s GDP to grow by 7% this year, after 9.4% last year.

    But construction of a deep-water port on the Black Sea – a potential key transit hub connecting Asia to Europe – has largely stalled since a Western-led consortium was booted from the project. A Chinese company has since won the contract but progress on building the port has been minimal.

    Meanwhile, Georgia now imports about 45% of its oil from Russia, up from just 8% in 2012, although Tbilisi and Moscow have no diplomatic relations.

    Ian Kelly, a former U.S. ambassador to Georgia, said the West could have done more to build links with Tbilisi.

    “We’re blowing it,” he said. “Georgia has opened the doors to Russia and China.”

    SPEED CHESS

    In recent weeks, Georgian Dream has undertaken a flurry of measures that look to root out what remains of political dissent.

    An impending lawsuit at the Constitutional Court will ban the three main opposition parties, while new criminal charges against nine key opposition figures – including jailed former President Mikheil Saakashvili – look sure to keep any potential challengers behind bars for years.

    Lately, the crackdown has targeted figures close to the ruling party itself, with recent criminal charges levied even against senior government ministers and former top allies of Georgian Dream founder Ivanishvili.

    The authorities are moving so quickly that Kapanadze, the former deputy speaker, likened the situation to “speed chess”, with the opposition trying to stave off checkmate while hoping the government makes tactical mistakes in its haste.

    Arrests at nightly anti-government protests outside the parliament keep political activists in states of fear, despair and resignation. Dozens are languishing in jail or have been fined for blocking the road.

    “Georgia has just disappeared, from not just the European table, but from the global stage,” said Grigol Gegelia of the Lelo party, which is facing a ban. “We are losing our country.”

  • United States abandons plan to disarm Hamas. What’s happening in Gaza?

    United States abandons plan to disarm Hamas. What’s happening in Gaza?

    According to Israeli TV Channel 13, the United States would be willing to give up on disarming Hamas in order to begin rebuilding Gaza immediately.

    According to an Israeli security source, since the White House is having difficulty obtaining commitments from third countries to participate in the disarmament of Hamas, it has begun to seek “temporary solutions, which are currently unacceptable to Israel”.

    “This temporary situation is the worst possible,” said a senior Israeli source. ‘Hamas has grown stronger in recent weeks, since the end of the war’.

    In short, there are currently no countries that have committed to deploying their own troops to Gaza with the mission of disarming Hamas. The excuse is that it requires the approval of the UN Security Council.

    For this reason, the Trump administration is insisting that the UN Security Council approve a draft on Monday that includes the entire 20-point peace plan proposed by US President Donald Trump, a plan that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also approved in September at a joint press conference with the president, although to be honest it seemed like ‘coerced approval’.

    According to a Rights Reporter source working in the intelligence sector, there are no Arab or Western countries willing to send troops to Gaza with the task of disarming Hamas, but only with the task of overseeing the distribution of humanitarian aid and reconstruction. “They know that committing to disarming Hamas also means committing to fighting”.

    In many ways, this situation is very similar to that in Lebanon, where Hezbollah refuses to disarm and no one is willing to support the Lebanese army in the “forced disarmament” of Hezbollah.

    A second Israeli internal intelligence source told Rights Reporter that the only ones ready to enter Gaza with an “apparent commitment to disarm Hamas” are the Turks, who are already in Egypt waiting to enter in the Strip. But Turkey is the same country that considers Hamas a resistance force and has repeatedly made serious threats against Israel. ‘There are currently about 5,000 Turkish soldiers in Egypt, apparently engineers and logisticians, but more likely special forces, at least for the most part. There is no other explanation for the shortage of transport vehicles they brought with them from Turkey’. Washington has already made it known that it has no objection to a “Turkish commitment”. Jerusalem is firmly opposed.

    For the sake of completeness, it should be noted that Russia has also prepared its own draft proposal for Gaza, to be presented to the UN Security Council on Monday. Without going into details, it is an unworkable proposal, but it will serve as an excuse for Moscow to veto the American proposal.

    Our source tells us: “Russia has every interest in the conflicts in the Middle East continuing. The more Israel fights, the more the United States sends weapons to the Jewish state. The more weapons they send to Jerusalem, the less they send to Kiev and its European allies”.

  • Why should Israel trust Ahmed al-Sharaa?

    Why should Israel trust Ahmed al-Sharaa?

    In an interview with the Washington Post, Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa addresses various issues, from his relationship with the United States and Russia to negotiations with Israel for its “withdrawal” from Syria.

    This is precisely what we need to focus on. Ahmed al-Sharaa argues that “Israel’s advances in Syria are not driven by security concerns, but by its expansionist ambitions.”

    Al-Sharaa claims that Syria and Israel are engaged in “direct talks” and that Syria’s demands, which are also supported by the United States, are basically that Israel withdraw to its positions prior to December 8, 2024, and that southern Syria not be demilitarized.

    Talking about demilitarizing an entire region will be difficult, because if there were chaos, who would protect it? If this demilitarized zone were used by some parties as a launching pad to attack Israel, who would take responsibility for that?” says al-Sharaa.

    Well, what are Israel’s legitimate concerns?

    • Can a person really go from being a cutthroat jihadist to a moderate politician overnight? Is this the truth or is it the greatest dissimulation (Taqiyya) of all time?
    • Returning the occupied land to Israel means giving up a fundamental buffer zone, or better still, a security zone aimed at preventing another October 7 and any attacks from Syrian territory. Leaving this task to al-Sharaa’s men is not even contemplated in the deepest corners of Israeli minds.
    • Israel’s demand to demilitarize the entire south of Syria should also be seen in this context. Ahmed al-Sharaa disagrees, but the risk of a Turkish contingent being positioned in that area is too great to be underestimated.
    • The Syrian leader is clearly a man of Erdogan, that is, a man of the Muslim Brotherhood, just like Hamas. Can Israel allow a person with this pedigree to position his armed men on the border with Israel?

    Al-Sharaa tells the Washington Post: “The United States is with us in these negotiations and many international parties support our position on this issue. Today we discovered that Mr. Trump also supports our position and will exert pressure as quickly as possible to reach a solution.”

    Who will Trump put pressure on? Israel? Isn’t it enough that he saved Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran? Now he also wants to make Erdogan happy by allowing him to realize (directly or indirectly) his dream of attacking the Jewish state?

    Israel can do without relations with Ahmed al-Sharaa just as it has done without relations with Bashar al-Assad. It is up to the Syrian leader to prove with facts that he is not hostile to the Jewish state. So far, he has done the opposite by attacking Kurds and Druze, close allies of Israel and hostile to Erdogan.

    So, can Israel trust Ahmed al-Sharaa? I would say no.